A social impact bond WAVE is building. Both sides of the political aisle are exploring. It's all about pay-for-performance funding. Like them or not, nonprofits need to surf this billion$ experiment. http://onforb.es/1lRmStP
All Posts (1986)
Which of the following tool (s) has the best prospect of making your board meeting THE EVENT of the month or quarter or whatever:
*consent agenda
*planning and choreography (including food)
*actionable agenda items
board-driven conversations
*nonve of the above
*all of the above
I believe if you checked "all of the above" you would be correct. Each of these activities can contribute to making happier and productive board meetings. Without these activities: less happier and productive meetings. Really! Try them out and let me know what if any works for you.
FISH OF GREATER NEW HAVEN, INC. – JOB POSTING
for public dissemination
July 23, 2014
Position: Executive Director
Overview:
FISH of Greater New Haven, Inc., is seeking a self-motivated, highly organized, and ambitious Executive Director (ED). The ED will administer and, in most cases, actively carry out operations of the organization, including program services, finances, development and fundraising, and public relations and communications. The ED will oversee an extensive corps of volunteers and work closely with an active Board of Directors (BOD).
FISH of Greater New Haven is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit food pantry, delivering groceries and foodstuffs to low- and no-income households in New Haven, Connecticut. FISH is the only food pantry in the area that delivers directly to clients’ doors and is staffed almost entirely by volunteers. Additional information can be found at www.fishgnh.org.
Responsibilities:
Program Services: Coordinate acquisition of groceries and foodstuffs via Conn. Food Bank, local vendors, and food drives. Coordinate packing and delivery of groceries, including determination of proper foods to be included. Coordinate and supervise volunteers. Maintain proper records and data on all clients for the purposes of both Quality Assurance and reporting. Prepare regular reports based on these records to deliver to the BOD.
Finances: Keep clear and well-organized records of all cash and in-kind revenue and expenses. Work with BOD Treasurer to affect proper accounting, including a projected and year-to-date budget, updated monthly. Administer all facilities-, utilities-, and service-related accounts.
Development & Fundraising: Develop a clear plan-of-action for revenue, annually. Administer, manage, and execute all grant applications and grant reports. Organize and execute regular fundraising efforts and events (with BOD assistance). Solicit and cultivate relationships with individual donors (with BOD assistance).
Public Relations & Communications: Administer and oversee production of quarterly newsletter/e-newsletter (with BOD assistance). Communicate with the FISH network of volunteers, donors, etc., via social media, email, direct mail, and telephone, including maintenance of a network database. Cultivate relationships with community partners (e.g., service organizations and religious congregations) and sister-organizations (e.g., Community Soup Kitchen, Loaves and Fishes). Represent FISH in the City’s Food Policy Council. Conduct regular community outreach efforts (with BOD assistance) via speaking engagements, etc.
Qualifications:
Bachelor’s degree plus at least 3 years of relevant experience in a nonprofit and/or human services setting. Master’s degree in social services, social work, nutrition/health, public administration/policy or other related field preferred.
Must possess excellent organizational skills. Must possess strong communication skills, both written and verbal, including interpersonal skills and a basic knowledge of client and donor confidentiality and privacy practices. Must be able to work both individually and collaboratively, as well as in a managerial capacity. Experience overseeing volunteers and knowledge of nutritional standards are pluses. Must possess excellent computer skills, including Microsoft Office suite, Adobe suite, web-based reporting programs, file management, social media, and mass-email communications. Past experience working with low- or no-income households and/or food assistance is a plus. Spanish proficiency is preferred. Must have a valid Connecticut driver’s license.
Supervisory Relationships: Reports to the Board of Directors. Supervises all volunteers.
Salary Range: $45,000 - $60,000 (commensurate with experience)
Schedule: 40 hours per week, regularly scheduled (TBD); occasional nights and weekends.
Application: Please submit a cover letter, résumé, and three references via email to Patrick Pearson (ppearson@fishofgreaternewhaven.org).
FISH of Greater New Haven, Inc., is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, gender, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, or unfavorable discharge from military service.
An editorial in today's New York Times discussed state and federal government crackdowns on private for-profit colleges and in particular, Corinthian College.
In the editorial, the paper notes:
Last year, the California attorney general, Kamala Harris, sued Corinthian, charging that it had lied to students and investors about job placement rates for its graduates. The company advertised job placement rates as high as 100 percent for certain programs, when, in some cases, there was no evidence that even a single student had secured a job within the prescribed period of time, according to the lawsuit, which is still pending. Furthermore, it charged that Corinthian deliberately singled out low-income single parents who lived near the poverty line, urging recruiters to focus on “isolated” people who had “low self-esteem.” It also asserted that the company advertised programs that it did not offer.
What I miss most from this editorial: what's the difference between these for-profits and their nonprofit and public sector counterparts. I think the difference important as a lesson for the future. That difference, two actually, is that nonprofit and public sector governance and ownership. Nonprofits and public sector colleges have for their oversight and direction, volunteer leaders committed to the goals of their institution and accountable with fiduciary responsibilities including a high bar in the area of care -- for mission and assets. And, these institutions are in effect, owned by the public, at least through the tax structure for the nonprofits and actual ownership for the public colleges. To me, both of these facts mean that the only reason at all to be engaged in education is for outcomes. Now, they may not always get this right and produce perfect outcomes, but the overseers are not personally profiting from the work and the mission inherently drives an intention to "do no harm".
For the for-profits, neither of these two fundamentals are present. Governance matters.
Happy July 4th To All,
I received a note from a friend of mine and I would like to share the message with all:
Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.
Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.
Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.
Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
What kind of men were they?
Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists.
Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well-educated,
but they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.
Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.
Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.
Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.
At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson,Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.
Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.
John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished.
So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for the price they paid.
Remember: freedom is never free! We thank these early patriots, as well as those patriots now fighting to KEEP our freedom!
I hope you will show your support by sending this to as many people as you can, please. It's time we get the word out that patriotism is NOT a sin, and the Fourth of July has more MEANING to it than beer, fireworks, HOT DOGS, and picnics......
IRIS – Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services (www.irisct.org), a dynamic nonprofit organization in New Haven CT, has an immediate opening for the full-time position of Operations Manager. IRIS helps refugees and asylees— people fleeing persecution in their home countries who are invited to the US by the federal government—to start new lives and become self-sufficient, contributing members of their communities. IRIS currently serves clients from countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Congo, Eritrea, and Sudan.
General Description
The Operations Manager is responsible for organizing and directing IRIS’s daily office operations. The goal of this position is to ensure a smooth operation of the day-to-day business of IRIS, making it possible for clients to be served effectively; for staff members to function efficiently; and for IRIS to comply with government requirements. The Operations Manager provides administrative and case management support to all staff, but works most closely with the Deputy Director, Executive Director, and Manager of Case Management.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities include:
- Serve as receptionist in front office, including answering phones, greeting dozens of refugee clients and visitors each day, and triaging client requests
- Help staff members troubleshoot IT issues, and serve as liaison with IT consultant
- Process invoices and mail payments
- Compile and submit biweekly payroll
- Maintain office files, including payroll, grantor documentation, and client finance reports; help prepare for annual financial audit
- Compile program and financial statistics and information for reports, as necessary
- Order office supplies and maintain office equipment; communicate and negotiate with vendors
- Maintain and update IRIS website
- Provide human resources support, including liaising with IRIS’s insurance company
- Provide basic administrative support to all staff and departments
- Maintain a neat, secure, and orderly office by preparing hospitality section (coffee & tea) each morning, and supervising the office cleaner
- Oversee Diaper Bank and Food Bank distributions
- Supervise volunteers and interns assigned to administrative and operations tasks
- Assist with fundraising tasks including appeal letters, thank you letters, and donor database maintenance.
- Other related tasks as necessary
Requirements
The successful candidate will have a minimum of 3-5 years of experience in an administrative position, non-profit experience preferred; excellent writing, communication, and organizational skills; and the ability to handle multiple demands and shifting priorities in a fast-paced environment. Candidate must be fluent in English. Ability to speak a second language is preferred. Candidate must have a demonstrated commitment to the mission of IRIS and awareness and sensitivity to multicultural issues. Candidate must be proficient with MS Windows and MS Office, including Word, Excel, and Outlook. Experience with Quickbooks, GiftWorks, Salesforce, MS Access or other databases, website maintenance, IT trouble shooting, and social media a plus.
To apply, send an email to Deputy Director Kelly Hebrank, at humanresources@irisct.org by July 14th with the following:
- A subject line that says “OPERATIONS MANAGER: [your first and last name]”
- A Cover Letter describing your relevant skills and experience, and why you are interested in this position
- An attached resume
IRIS – Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services (www.irisct.org), a dynamic nonprofit organization in New Haven CT, has an immediate opening for the full-time position of Reception & Placement (R&P) Case Manager. IRIS helps refugees and asylees— people fleeing persecution in their home countries who are invited to the US by the federal government—to start new lives and become self-sufficient, contributing members of their communities. IRIS currently serves clients from countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Congo, Eritrea, and Sudan.
General Description
Operating under the Reception & Placement (R&P) requirements of the federal refugee resettlement program, the Case Manager will join a dedicated team in providing case management services to hundreds of refugees and asylees each year. The R&P Case Manager will ensure that clients’ basic needs are met during their first 90 days in the US; that they learn about US culture and norms and feel comfortable navigating their new communities; and that they make progress towards becoming self-sufficient. The R&P Case Manager will supervise a part-time assistant, and a team of interns and volunteers.
This job is primarily direct service with refugee clients, along with administrative work required by funders.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities include:
- Prepare for and welcome newly arriving refugee families and individuals
- Ensure refugees’ basic needs (housing, food, clothing, etc.) are addressed
- Provide community and cultural orientation
- Assist clients in accessing appropriate external services and public benefits, including from Social Security Administration and Department of Social Services
- Communicate and coordinate closely with other IRIS staff who provide services such as English class, childcare, education, health care, employment, and immigration legal services
- Help refugees develop a resettlement plan and household budget, and encourage clients to work towards self-sufficiency and early employment
- Identify and address barriers and challenges to successful resettlement
- Operate as a cultural broker between refugees, volunteers, and service providers
- Working with the IRIS Volunteer Coordinator, ensure that proper language interpretation and translation are provided for all meetings with clients and for important documents
- Maintain and complete case files and documentation for each case, including financial expenditures, reports of client outcomes, and evidence of client self-sufficiency
- Maintain regular contact with cases, including home visits
- Other related tasks as assigned
Requirements
Candidates must have at least three years of relevant experience; strong writing, communication and organizational skills; computer skills including Microsoft Word and Excel; and ability to handle multiple demands and shifting priorities in a fast-paced environment. Ideal candidates will have experience supervising others. Candidates must have a demonstrated commitment to the mission of IRIS and awareness and sensitivity to multicultural issues. Candidates must be fluent in English. Proficiency in another language is desirable, especially Arabic, Dari, Farsi, Swahili, Tigrinya, French, or Spanish. Candidates must be able to work occasional evenings. Candidates must have US driver’s license and be willing to drive clients to appointments.
To apply, send an email to Deputy Director Kelly Hebrank, at humanresources@irisct.org by July 14th with the following:
- A subject line that says “R&P CASE MANAGER: [Candidate first and last name]”
- A cover letter describing your relevant skills and experience, and why you are interested in this position
- An attached resume
What should happen when a nonprofit board learns that its CEO does not actually have the credentials he claims?
Recently in Hartford, CT the 17-year CEO of a nonprofit charter school enterprise resigned pretty much on short-notice. The reporting source, WFSB on-line, tells that word had circulated that the CEO was not a PhD. According to the report it's not clear that this is the sole reason for the resignation but for sure, impersonating a PhD can create a number of challenges for an academic institution.
While the CEO's resignation reduces the ability of the nonprofit board to take action, it feels appropriate to indeed ask the question: what would action have looked like if the board did learn that it's CEO was not all he/she claimed to be? Should a board take immediate action citing that such misrepresentation is not ever acceptable and just fire the individual? Or, and I don't know the rules, but let's say that 17 years ago when the board hired the CEO, it knew the individual was a PhD candidate and understood that pursuit of completing the degree was eventual. Maybe the board even accepted use of the title believing it would help in developing the schools and because intention was good, no harm was being done.
But isn't this the crux of the question: has harm been done by using a title that is not valid? If credentialling bodies consider having a CEO who is a PhD more valuable and they certify accordingly, is this incorrect. And, if students and parents learn that the head of the school isn't who they think it is, is this ok -- does it not convey a message about "how to get ahead".
A nonprofit board must establish the organization's values and live by these. If it's CEO turns out to have fabricated their worth via a false representation of their academic status, it would strike me as correct to remove that individual. And, if the individual removes themselves, does this not also mean that the board's obligations to the individual are lesser as well?
Yes, harm has been done but is it not offset by the good that was done -- an amazing educational center with significant numbers of children who have performed better than they would have had they not experienced this school and this CEO?
Every Sunday night, West Haven family child care provider Yanerys Aziz strategizes for the coming week. She thinks about the materials she’ll lay out for children on her theme table, the arrangement of her child care space, and the activities she’ll propose in the days to come. The children she cares for will arrive early the next morning, and Yanerys wants to be prepared to offer them experiences that nurture their curiosity and help them grow and learn. Since 2007, when she opened the doors to her family child care program, Yanerys has exemplified the creativity, perseverance, and commitment to continuous learning that so many of All Our Kin’s providers share.
Continue reading on All Our Kin's blog, All Our Words.
It is pretty much the practice of nonprofits to establish board term limits. Most common among these practices is the 2-3 year term and 1 year off rule recognizing that for large organizations, 3-3 year terms takes into account the learning curve that may be needed to create effective boards. Admittedly, there are quite a number of nonprofit boards that I have encountered that do not implement their term limits for all kinds of lame reasons: we don't want to lose our invaluable member (what, once they aren't a board member they will never talk to the organization again?) and, it's too hard to find qualified and capable members (how well have you looked?). But pretty much it is understood that terms and term limits. when practiced, produces better outcomes for the board and organization.
But what about execs? I have been and will continue to maintain that the "habit" of many nonprofits to not establish a "term limit" on the exec can produce its own negative results. A recent Conference Board report illustrates what for-profits are doing around this issue. And one statement is particularly noteworthy to me:
With longevity, the CEO can cultivate closer ties with directors, which may hinder the independence of board oversight and weaken the objectivity of the performance evaluation process. When adequately used, policies on CEO retirement based on age or term limits may offer an additional safeguard to existing governance practices and serve as an integral component of CEO succession planning.
I think the lessons from this report apply equally to nonprofits and nonprofit boards should consider the question of ceo term limits which can in the end, compliment and be a sound part of succession planning. Note, I'm not needing to see all nonprofit execs retire, I'm just, saying that staying forever is not in the long range best interest of the nonprofit.
It's finally here a fun loving fitness facility that is dedicated to the entire family. Not only do we provide affordable classes but we also have FREE Zumba® classes for both adults and kids.
Take a look: BEyond FITness
Feel free to "like" us on Facebook for more fitness fun at FACEBOOK
FREE:
Every Tuesday 6:15pm Zumba® (adults class)
Session 2- June 3- June 24th: 5:30pm Zumba® Kids (ages 4-11yrs) Parents/Guardians are encouraged to participate.
Share away ;)
A recent shake-up in a nonprofit dependent on its credibility and adherence to high ethical standards can serve to remind nonprofit board and staff that conflicts of interest are not specific to board members alone.
"The CFA Institute (Chartered Financial Analyst Institute) is best known for administering the Chartered Financial Analyst exams, a rigorous test of financial analysis and ethics. This year, nearly 150,000 candidates from 179 countries registered to take one of the exams, often after years of study, on June 7. The organization has 119,000 members. CFA has an annual budget of $231 million. Its executive was paid $1.4 million in fiscal year 2013.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the executive "stepped down" after a board review that followed its learning about the executive's relationship with a senior staff member. The Journal notes that "While the organization's code of conduct doesn't prohibit relationships between staff, a concern on the board was that potential conflicts from the relationship could open CFA Institute to litigation or public criticism, people familiar with the situation said."
Whew! I understand rigor and all and the duty by the board to ensure that its biggest asset, rigor to high standards, is preserved but I for one wonder that this action doesn't stretch the meanings. I however do recognize that when an inner office relationship between a supervisor and supervisee shifts to something of an amorous nature, power dynamics can also change and perhaps in turn, risks to outcomes. At the same time I would expect that an organization like the CFA would have instituted enough checks and balances that inner-office dynamics would not directly affect the quality of its product. Might word of a relationship affect perceptions of quality by members? This of course becomes the basis for the board's action. I would expect though that the board must adjust its code of conduct to reflect its own sense of the impact of inner-office relationships.
At this point, based on its action, I'm led to wonder whether the board didn't have previous issues with its exec to reach this end result. This for me would be the only reason to take an action that did not otherwise have institutional documentation. Food for thought.
IRIS – Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services (www.irisct.org), a dynamic nonprofit organization in New Haven CT, has an immediate opening for the full-time position of Health & Wellness Program Coordinator. IRIS helps refugees and asylees— people fleeing persecution in their home countries who are invited to the US by the federal government—to start new lives and become self-sufficient, contributing members of their communities. IRIS currently serves clients from countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba, Congo, and Sudan.
The goal of IRIS's Health & Wellness Program is for refugees to have prompt access to high quality, culturally and linguistically competent medical care. Refugees' health needs will be addressed and they will receive health education, to enable them to become healthy, productive members of the community.
The Health and Wellness Program Coordinator (HWPC) will coordinate healthcare and health education for newly-arrived refugees (approximately 200/year) and other IRIS clients. The HWPC will provide refugees and asylees with medical case management, and will orient them to New Haven and the healthcare system. The HWPC will also advocate on behalf of clients and engage with the medical community on issues related to refugee and immigrant health and health care. The HWPC will coordinate with other IRIS staff members to help clients overcome health-related barriers to employment or education, and to help them achieve self-sufficiency soon after arriving in the US.
This job is a mix of direct service and administrative work.
Candidates must have relevant experience; strong writing, communication and organizational skills; and ability to handle multiple demands and shifting priorities in a fast-paced environment. Candidates must have a demonstrated commitment to the mission of IRIS and awareness and sensitivity to multicultural issues. Candidates must be fluent in English. Proficiency in another language is desirable, especially Arabic, Spanish, French, Swahili, or Tigrinya. Candidates must be able to work occasional evenings. Ideally, candidates would have driver’s license and be willing to drive clients in personal vehicle to appointments in the area.
To apply, send an email to Kelly Hebrank, Deputy Director, at humanresources@irisct.org by June 27th with the following:
- Subject line MUST say “HEALTH & WELLNESS PROGRAM COORDINATOR: [Candidate first and last name]”
- Cover letter describing your relevant skills and experience, and why you are interested in this position
- Attached resume
How much does diversity really matter to an organization--externally?
A New York Times article took a look at how today's organizations may have even put into their policies a commitment to diversifying their boards but have very little to show to this commitment. The Times asks: Companies today earn points for listening to their shareholders and agreeing to change governance practices that are seen as unenlightened or troublesome. But is there a penalty if a company reneges on its promise of change? And further into the article: The continuing problem of homogeneity in corporate boards is a case in point. Despite shareholder efforts to bring more diversity to these posts, women and minorities are still few and far between in the boardroom. These hushed precincts still fit the description given by one governance expert: “male, pale and stale.”
As the rest of the article points out, organizations that pay attention and act to diversify the composition of their board can improve their results (e.g. the value of the company worth). But making these changes can clearly be perceived as too much work. Really? And while we are predominantly discussing for-profits, what about nonprofits? Just how diverse are they? And what is the impact of diversifying the composition of a nonprofit's board? I'd welcome hearing about folks' experiences about their non-diverse and diverse boards; the processes used to diversify; and what has been the impact when diversity was a focus.
Originally posted on new haven speaks:
Over the years, I’ve started many workshops for parents and child care providers with a simple brainstorm activity. I ask, “What are your dreams for your children, or for the children in your child care?” I’ve completed this activity more than twenty times. Every time, the answers are the same: independence, love, safety, relationships.
This has been an important lesson for me. All people, no matter how diverse, have the same basic dreams for the young children in their lives.
But here in New Haven, many children don’t get the kind of start any of us would hope for. More than a third of kids in our city live in poverty (37.3 percent, according to the 2008-2012 American Community Survey). Close to twenty percent of children in our county were “food insecure” in 2011—meaning that they lacked consistent access to adequate food.
Continue reading on new haven speaks.
This year is the 150th anniversary of what was once known as the Girls Club of America and is now called Girls Inc. The story of Girls Inc involved seven women, the founding board, who shared a passion and a commitment to get the job done. I pose that this is what governance is all about.
Here's the story from the Christian Science Monitor:
In 1864, with the Civil War in its fourth year and Union troops wearing Waterbury Button Company buttons on their uniforms, seven society women in Waterbury decided it was high time to help the young women in their midst. And so on Jan. 15 the founders inked their names in what is now a sepia-toned notebook.
The founders envisioned a school where young women would learn how to keep a home together with some basic education in writing, reading, and mathematics. Primarily it was akin to a finishing school for young working women, Maglio says.
That approach lasted into the 1950s. But as the sexual revolution and women’s rights movements arrived, and the organization realized it needed to shift its focus – and quickly. “We’re about having our girls feel confident with what success is – and it can be different things for different girls,” Maglio says.
Kudos to those who have keep the founders' dreams alive!
When the US Justice Department says to your nonprofit board: " the one-man staff of Philadelphia Safety Net, repeatedly gave himself raises without board approval." you know you must be doing something wrong.
But this is indeed what the Justice Department said to the Philadelphia-based Safety Net which was undergoing an audit from having received its funds through its Congressman's earmark. Turns out that the organization, staffed by one individual who was a former staff member to the Congressman received an annual salary of $364K. The audit concluded saying that it found that "62 percent of Safety Net's spending of federal funds was unallowable, unsupported, or unreasonable". In addition, the executive was cited as having "used some of the public funds for his own expenses", the audit said. It said he did not repay Safety Net for $2,218 in personal spending in 2009, including paying off $393 in parking tickets, a $286 hotel room, and cash withdrawals totaling $1,149. The audit also said Jones used $1,171 in state funds in 2008 to pay for clothing and restaurant bills."
However, from an outcomes perspective, the organization appears to have had an impact taking more than 3500 guns off the street (the program was all about buying back guns).
So, failed board? I would offer there was barely any board, at least providing oversight. But how much does it matter if goals were met?
To review the article, take a look here.
The case of a New York City minister, his wife and the executive director have agreed to pay-back loans with interest and penalties they borrowed from their church and two related nonprofits. I am scratching my head a bit over the "must pay back clause" because the Wall Street Journal doesn't really indicate there was any intention not to pay back their loan (which they used to buy a house and property. Some of the loan was also used to buy a car (yes, a BMW). Alas, additional monies were used to purchase trips for the couple to visit their sons in college.
So, we have here a few issues. According to the Attorney General, it is state law that directors and officers may not be the beneficiary of a nonprofit's loans. I will admit that this was new to me. Over the years I have known of a number of instances where boards have indeed made financial loans to their execs particularly for a house to live-in.
This particular case came to the forefront of the news because these loans were viewed externally as diverting nonprofit money away from their intended purpose. But the couple did actually conduct related transactions that were less than legally or even morally acceptable and indeed, action should be taken, I think, beyond just getting the money with penalties paid.
And indeed, this is likely the reason boards should be cautious about lending. That there were legal prohibitions agains these transactions was news to me so I poked around the web and found that such transactions are not actually prohibited in every state in the US. And, when their are sanctions, their are circumstances. The lesson: boards should seek legal counsel should the subject arise and their is not already a board-developed policy in place recognizing that federal and state laws always trump a nonprofit's laws when there is a difference between the two.
But, to wrap this story up, the Journal article also notes that: Three former members of the Glad Tidings' board agreed to pay $50,000 in penalties for neglecting their oversight duties. Whoa -- gotta hand it to the AG who took all of this very seriously. And nonprofit boards everywhere should do the same. Ignorance is not blissful.
The Summer Learning Program is a free, safe, academically and socially enriching environment for children ages 5-16, weekday mornings from 9:00am-12:30pm. The Summer Learning Program's focus is on English language acquisition, positive socialization and school readiness. This is a multicultural classroom with youth who often do not hear English spoken in their homes.
The lead teacher will coordinate and facilitate daily programming for approximately 35 refugee students, who will be divided into separate groups or gathered together as the teacher sees fit to best promote academic and social success. The lead teacher will organize, use, and supervise volunteers to assist with facilitating lessons and student supervision. With the support of volunteers, the lead teacher will be responsible for assessing and meeting daily needs of students and for creating the best possible learning environment for students, inside and outside the classroom. The lead teacher will be responsible for helping to organize recreational opportunities and accompany students on field trips to sites around the state and for helping to organize visitors to the program.
The ideal candidate will have or be working towards Elementary Education or TESOL certification, or a related field, and will have experience with children in an educational setting. Candidates should also have experience working closely with other adults and, preferably, supervisory experience. Awareness of and sensitivity to cross-cultural issues is a must.
To apply, send a resume and cover letter to: Tanya Kimball Genn, Education & Youth Services Coordinator, at education@irisct.org
Good Day To All,
Usually I like to write about the various persons connected within the cemetery and the walk-about with those persons. But for this note today, I would like to discuss the Walk for Autism which took place in Wallingford two weeks ago.
Needless, to say, it was a wonderful time to give to a great cause. My team was the "Marissa Monsters". Marissa is the daughter of Lisa and George Carranzo, the owners of Grand Apizza (New Haven's Best Kept Secret) located at 111 Grand Avenue, New Haven, 203.624.7646.
The walk is hosted at Rosemary-Choate School and then from this point of central position we walked through the historic part of the city of Wallingford. There was a Dixie Jazz Band and other amusements - like walking on bubblewrap, etc. The day was awesome with the best weather ever and the people were just as great.
So I encourage anyone to commit to this occasion once a year - it is for such a great cause. This past year the group raised around $2500.00 to develop a cure.
If interested call Lisa or George at 203.624.7646 and they will assist in any questions, or concerns you may have with the Walk.
Cheers to All,
Patricia Illingworth
Chief Docent
Grove Street Cemetery