YANA Consulting is one of the newest and most exciting initiatives launched by the Yale Alumni Nonprofit Alliance (YANA) Fellows. Working in partnership with Yale Undergraduate Career Services, YANA Consulting connects nonprofits in various sectors with select Yale undergraduates, who provide pro-bono management consulting services. During a given semester, YANA consultants work on projects as diverse as talent identification and recruiting for a nonprofit board, outreach design for an environmental organization, development and fund-raising support for museums, and strategic planning for an educational institution. The roles student-consultants have taken on in their respective projects have been equally varied.
All Posts (10)
Once again, nonprofit CEO salaries are in the news. This time the focus is not on the traditional nonprofits but the religious nonprofits and more specifically, pastors. And, as much as I must honestly grit my teeth to say this, given the focus, this salary "issues" is a subject the media loves to rattle about but if they want to point swords, they should be doing so at the boards who approve these salaries.
I remain a firm believer that the media would serve the taxpayer and donor best not by focusing on salaries (as insane as they may feel about "some" CEOs) and instead raise the questions about results. The question is not, is $800K an unfair salary, but, are the folks who support this salary, in the case of a faith practice, truly better off (using whatever measures apply)?
CEO salaries will for the most part never "feel" fair to the majority of folks who don't earn the level of pay nonprofit CEOs do. For many, these folks won't ever make this kind of money because that's the way the capitalistic system works. But CEOs, when they are great, can produce results and that's what the salaries pay for and that in turn is what we should be asking the media to tell us about.
Meanwhile, it's up to the boards to determine what's right for their institutions. And, it appears that for the ministers in the Graham category, $800K+ is what they feel is correct. Harrumph but so what!
So, from the Washington Post:
Why Franklin Graham’s salary raises eyebrows among Christian nonprofits
By Christine Wicker | Religion News Service August 18 at 5:42 PM
Franklin Graham’s annual compensation of $880,000, revealed in a Charlotte Observer story, has some worrying that too many top Christian nonprofit leaders as well as pastors are seeing themselves as CEOs instead of as God’s servants.
Graham, son of renowned evangelist Billy Graham, is head of Samaritan’s Purse, an international relief agency based in Boone, N.C.
“Basically they are saying if Satan pays well, God should pay better,” said Maria Dixon, a Southern Methodist University professor of corporate communications and public affairs. Dixon, a United Methodist Church deacon and a minister’s wife, specializes in studying and helping nonprofit religious organizations.
CEOs at the top 50 U.S. charities, including Samaritan’s Purse, earn in the $350,000 to $450,000 range, which makes Graham’s $622,000 salary from his aid organization alone about 40 percent to 50 percent higher than average, according to a Forbes story. He receives the rest of his $258,000 compensation as CEO of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.
A spokesman for Franklin Graham said his compensation was determined by independent commissions that compared similar organizations’ top salaries. Graham was not available to answer questions.
By contrast, pastor salaries at the nation’s biggest Christian churches are much lower for all but a select number. Only 3 percent of churches with more than 1,600 people in attendance pay senior pastors more than $300,000, said Warren Bird, research director at Leadership Network. At the other extreme, a recent study by the National Association of Church Business Administration found that the average American pastor with a congregation of 300 people earns a salary of less than $28,000 a year.
In a 2011 comparison of megachurch pastors’ salaries, two senior pastors made $1 million and $1.1 million. Others were a fourth to less than half of that.
Among the exceptions: Southern Baptist the Rev. Ed Young, senior pastor at Fellowship Church in Grapevine, Texas, pulled in well over $1 million, according to a 2012 Dallas television news report. And in 2013, his last year as pastor at Seattle’s Mars Hill Church, the Rev. Mark Driscoll was drawing a $607,000 package, with a $150,000 raise promised.
Click here for more information!
The word “CEO” is often used when speaking of megachurch pastors who oversee multimillion-dollar budgets, manage media empires and publish best-selling books. “He could have been a CEO in any corporation in America” is an oft-repeated phrase among proud church members.
Pastors make sure well-heeled businesspeople are on their boards, said Jim Henderson, co-author of “Question Mark,” a new book tracing the downfall of Mars Hill’s Driscoll.
“These guys make phenomenal amounts of money. So when it comes time to set the pastor’s salary, what seems like an ungodly amount of money to the rest of us, seems normal to them,” Henderson said.
A prosperous church with business executives on its board might ask “How embarrassed would we be to pay our pastor a lot less than I make?” said historian Joel Carpenter, director of the Nagel Institute for the Study of World Christianity at Calvin College.
But donors to Christian charities may think differently.
Grant Wacker, author of “America’s Pastor: Billy Graham and the Shaping of a Nation,” said he had just read the Observer story about Franklin Graham’s compensation when he received a solicitation for money from Samaritan’s Purse.
Compensation in the mid- to high-six figures “is on the generous side for anyone who is asking for other people’s money,” the professor emeritus at Duke Divinity School said a bit wryly. “It’s eyebrow-raising.”
Mainstream evangelicals generally expect money they give to be used frugally, Wacker said. Big salaries come with questions.
“Does he live ostentatiously or does he give it away?” asked Wacker.
Franklin Graham, who is 63, has said he wants to make enough money to be able to work for free when he turns 70.
By contrast, California megachurch pastor Rick Warren has been giving away 90 percent of his income for years, as part of a strategy he calls “reverse tithing.”
Such outside comparisons are considered good practice for nonprofits, but the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability asks for more.
“Compensation-setting practices should be consistent with generally accepted biblical truths and practices,” according to its guidelines.
“It’s a moral issue particularly for a man of faith,” Pablo Eisenberg, a senior fellow at the Georgetown University Center for Public & Nonprofit Leadership, told the Observer. “And also you have to remember that (compensation is) partly paid for by the taxpayer. In a sense, we the taxpayers are subsidizing Frank Graham’s salary and his relatives who are paid.”
Nonprofits are governed by the federal nondistribution constraint, which specifies that in return for tax-exempt status, they will use donations for the good of clients and not distribute excessive amounts to those who oversee the organization, Dixon said.
“I don’t have a problem with people like Franklin making so much money as long as the janitor is making $60,000 to $80,000, a good living wage,” she said.
Not all of the big Christian charity CEOs are making huge salaries.
Lutheran Charities, a $21 billion organization, pays $181,858 to its highest-paid employee. At Cru, the college campus ministry, the highest salary is $150,787, according to Forbes magazine.
CEO Steve Stirling at MAP, a $349 million international Christian aid organization, made significantly more than his current $200,000 total compensation at other jobs, both for-profit and nonprofit.
“I did take a reduction in salary from my previous job,” he wrote from Ghana, where he is working this August.
Why? “Because MAP is a Christian organization, and I strongly believe in the mission.”
Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC
In my experience, nonprofit board composition is pretty homogenous - that is to say that I find that nonprofit boards tend not to stray in composition from the folks who first organized the organization. This would lead one to suggest that nonprofit board diversity doesn't matter that much. Possibly.
HP' which is going to be splitting into two corporations (same CEO on both boards) has announced that its boards "will comprise leaders with some of the most diverse backgrounds and professional experiences I’ve seen in my career".
The article suggests that Operation Push has had something to do with this plan and that may well be but no corporation does anything without its own best interests in mind. So, my question, why does such diversity matter to HP. The article does not provide much additional insight into incentives but I'm certainly open to hearing other's thoughts on the topic.
At the same time I propose that while nonprofit boards may be gender diverse and in my opinion not all that connected with those they serve, there may well be a lesson to be learned from the HP shift.
HP will have the most diverse tech boards in the US, say activists
LYANNE ALFARO
Aug. 14, 2015, 11:45 AM
Hewlett-Packard is preparing to diverge into two companies this November, but it can also claim a new achievement for diversity in the national tech workspace.
HP now has the "most diverse" boards in the US, according to the nonprofit Rainbow PUSH.
The HP boards, announced earlier this week, will feature a blend of original members and new hires. Four women and two people of color will be placed on each board, reported Fortune.
Rainbow PUSH is an organization focused on social change and has been urging technology companies across the country to hire underrepresented minorities.
The nonprofit has especially ramped up its efforts in the past year, meeting with tech behemoths across the country, including Apple and Google, to discuss their diversity numbers. A survey conducted by the group last fall found only three blacks and one Hispanic among the 189 board members from 20 technology companies examined.
There were also "153 men and just 36 women. Eleven (over half) have all-white Boards," Reverend Jesse Jackson, who is spearheading Rainbow PUSH, said in a press release. He later added, "Certainly there is a long way to go."
Last March, the nonprofit met with HP at its shareholder meeting to talk about its numbers.
"We challenged them — and the tech industry — to confront the virtual exclusion of women and people of color in the tech industry," Rev. Jackson said. "HP committed to make demonstrable strides in expanding diversity and inclusion."
At HP Enterprise, Leslie A. Brun from Sarr Group, and Pamela Carter, former president Cummins Distribution, are both people of color who will be joining. The board has 13 members in total, according to an HP press release. Heading the team will be Pat Russo, who became a part of the HP board in 2011.
The board at HP Inc. will include Stacy Brown-Philpot, chief operating officer at TaskRabbit, and Stacey Mobley, former senior vice president at DuPont. Twelve people will help oversee HP Inc., which focuses on the printer and PC businesses.
HP CEO Meg Whitman will sit on both boards and serve as chairwoman for HP Inc.
“The post-separation Boards for both Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. comprise leaders with some of the most diverse backgrounds and professional experiences I’ve seen in my career,” Whitman said in HP's press release.
Apply to PAVE New Haven to #ServeaYear as an#AmeriCorps #VISTA!
Citywide Youth Coalition, Inc., Common Ground High School, Urban Farm, and Environmental Education Center, Higher Heights Youth Empowerment Programs, Inc., Agency on Aging of South Central ConnecticutVolunteer and Training Dept. and Solar Youth, Inc are all excepting applications!
AmeriCorps VISTA - Volunteers In Service To America. Apply at http://bit.ly/ApplyPAVE
Starting in early September the City of New Haven will offer a nine-week course in city government, New Haven Democracy School. The purpose of Democracy School is to turn residents into more effective advocates for their neighborhoods and communities by giving them a holistic picture of how city government really functions. Students will meet department heads and public safety officials, look deeper into the city's budget, tour the Emergency Operations Center, and network with other engaged residents from all over the city.
This is an invaluable opportunity to develop new tools for becoming a more effective activist and organizer in your community.
Here's an article about a previous version of Democracy School.
Applications are due August 21. Eligibility is limited to New Haven residents 18 years and older, and only 25 students will be accepted. Classes will meet on Thursday evenings from 5:30-8:00pm beginning September 3 and going through November 5.
Click here for more information and click here for the application.
The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven has awarded $212,000 to 8 nonprofit organizations working with immigrants and $109,000 to 4 nonprofits serving formerly incarcerated individuals and their families. A total of 33 applications were received as part of a special grants process created by The Community Foundation this year; these grants are awarded in furtherance of The Foundation’s immigration and re-entry strategies which were adopted in 2014.
The 2015 grants by The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven complement strategic grants awarded in the previous year to three organizations that also provide services under The Foundation’s two strategic focus areas: Transitions Clinic Network $50,000 (Reentry), Connecticut Women’s Consortium $20,300 (Reentry) and Junta for Progressive Action $50,000 (Immigration Integration).
2015 Immigrant Integration Strategy Grants
Connecticut Students for a Dream ($12,000 single year total) to support replicating the work done with much success in other regions by creating a more institutionalized and sustainable presence in the Greater New Haven Region as a resource to undocumented youth, families and allies by training more mentors for our College Access Program, creating more safe spaces, hosting more CAP workshops, and implementing both a leadership and political education training curriculum for undocumented youth in the region.
New Haven Legal Assistance ($45,000 multi-year total; $15,000 each of three years) to support legal services for undocumented workers who have not been paid the wages they earned, or who have experienced other workplace violations.
Congregations Organized for a New Connecticut ($10,000 single year total) to support launching an anti- exploitation campaign regarding driver’s licenses.
Elm City Internationals ($15,000 single year total) to support a college preparatory reading and writing program with college follow-through services for Elm City Internationals students who are all ELL student athletes.
Springs Learning Center ($22,125 multi-year total; $7,375 each of three years) to support learners along with investments to help the center train and manage its growing cadre of volunteer tutors as well as to market itself to garner new investors and tutors.
Unidad Latina Accion ($75,000 multi-year total; $25,000 each of three years) to support immigrants who are exploited and abused at work, especially workers who are being paid below the minimum wage and those who labor long hours without the required overtime pay; empower immigrants who are facing discrimination in the immigration or criminal legal justice system; and empowering women and children to address the issues listed above.
Apostle Immigrant Services ($25,935 multi-year total; $13,345 first year, $12,590 second year) to support the "Victim to Victor" project and expand services for immigrant victims of violent crime seeking to obtain legal status through the U visa program; a petition for U status is often the only available avenue for undocumented persons to achieve legal status for themselves and immediate family members.
Center for Children's Advocacy ($7,500 single year total) to support the work with the International Institute of Connecticut (IIConn) and Unidad Latina en Accion (ULA) to provide training and technical assistance to increase the number of pro bono attorneys able to represent undocumented New Haven youth who have been abandoned or abused, to help them secure Special Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) Status, which gives youth a legal status that allows them to stay in the United States; and to work with partners to identify systemic barriers to education and health care for new arrival youth in New Haven.
2015 Reentry Strategy Grants
Career Resources Inc. ($50,000 multi-year total; $25,000 each of two years) to support the New Haven Women Investing in Second Chances or (W.I.N.S.) program, an innovative program to serve formerly incarcerated women, by providing them with gender responsive programming, life skills and a supportive work opportunity.
Phoenix Association ($14,679 single year total) to support reducing recidivism rates by helping to transform prisons, with the Connecticut Department of Correction (CT DOC), into "communities that enable success" by changing prisons to become as fully humane, supportive, holistic and safe as possible, for both inmates and prison staff.
Liberty Community Services Inc. ($35,000 single year total) to assist people reentering the community from incarceration to secure housing by identifying and coordinating with landlords, matching apartment-mates, and utilizing flexible subsidies and funding to secure and stabilize permanent housing.
New Haven Legal Assistance ($10,000 single year total) to provide civil legal services to ex-offenders, prioritizing legal matters that seek to reduce barriers to housing, employment, health care and other basic needs.
The goal of The Community Foundation’s immigrant integration strategy is that: Immigrants, including undocumented immigrants in Greater New Haven achieve greater civic and economic participation and success thereby becoming more fully integrated members of a more welcoming community. The Community Foundation believes that immigrants are critical assets and is committed to the ongoing work of making Greater New Haven a welcoming community. Work that removes barriers to full social, economic, and civic participation of immigrants not only helps them reach their individual potentials, but also brings the benefits of economic growth and cultural diversity to the community as a whole.
The goal of The Community Foundation’s reentry strategy is that: More formerly incarcerated individuals re-entering New Haven will be able to get the necessary services and support to be empowered to reintegrate positively, making them less likely to re-offend. The Community Foundation believes that the successful readjustment of formerly incarcerated individuals will also have positive effects on those impacted by their incarceration including their children, family and community. As such, The Foundation is particularly committed to supporting new and innovative programs among community-based organizations, faith-based organizations and re-entry providers that treat the whole person and address underlying problems that often go deeper than a single issue, be they related to physical or mental health, education, housing, family and/or employment.
This weekend I discovered a book that was published several years ago (April 2009) that strikes me as worth a brief mention here. The book, Owning Up...14 Questions Every Board Member Needs to Ask by Dr. Ram Charan..strikes me as worth a discussion because it poses some questions that could be helpful in framing the work of the nonprofit board.
I'm not actually that familiar with Dr. Ram Charan, a kind-of guru in the for-profit governance world but he appears to be well regarded in the business community. I know, well regarded in the for-profit sector does not instantly translate to well-regarded in the nonprofit sector but for the moment lets accept that there is some value in at least reviewing the 14 questions offered in "Owning Up".
I recommend paying particular attention to Questions 10, 6, 9, 11, 12, 1 and 13 in this order. As a matter practicality, I propose that if a board asks and answers these questions, it can go far in significantly improving board outcomes.
Here's the questions:
1. Is our Board composition right for the challenge?
2. Are we addressing the risks that could send our company over the cliff?
3. Are we prepared to do our job when crisis erupts?
4. Are we prepared to name our next CEO?
5. Does our Boar really own the company strategy?
6. How can we get the information we need to govern well?
7. How can our Board get CEO compensation right?
8. Why do we need a lead director anyway?
9. Is our governance committee best of breed?
10. How do we get the most value out of our limited time?
11. How can executive sessions help the Board own up?
12. How can our Board self-evaluation improve our functions & our output?
13. How do we stop from micromanaging?
14. How prepared are we to work with activist shareholders & their proxies?
Yes, there are other questions a nonprofit board can ask and answer but imagine just getting through at least the questions I highlighted.
Matching Funds Program - Third Round of Funding Available
CIRCA: Nearly $100,000 to Support Climate Resilience Across Connecticut
The Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation (CIRCA) is pleased to announce its third round of funding through the exciting Matching Funds Program. CIRCA has made up to $100,000 available for matching funds for projects that will assist Connecticut towns and cities adapt to a changing climate and enhance the resilience of their infrastructure.
CIRCA will consider requests from Connecticut municipalities, institutions, universities, foundations, and other non-governmental organizations. To be funded, a successful Matching Funds request must have a commitment of primary funding within 6 months of the CIRCA award announcement, or have received a waiver from the CIRCA Executive Steering Committee. CIRCA Matching Funds will provide up to 25% of the primary funder's contribution other than municipal or State of Connecticut funds to enhance the likely success of project proposals that advance CIRCA research and implementation priorities. Requests are due to CIRCA by September 15, 2015.
Project proposals should develop knowledge and/or experience that is transferable to multiple locations in Connecticut and have well-defined and measurable goals. In evaluating proposals preference will be given to those that leverage independent funding awarded through a competitive process. Preference will also be given to those that involve collaboration with CIRCA to address at least one of the following priority areas:
• Improve scientific understanding of the changing climate system and its local and regional impacts on coastal and inland floodplain communities;
• Develop and deploy natural science, engineering, legal, financial, and policy best practices for climate resilience;
• Undertake or oversee pilot projects designed to improve resilience and sustainability of the natural and built environment along Connecticut's coast and inland waterways;
• Create a climate-literate public that understands its vulnerabilities to a changing climate and which uses that knowledge to make scientifically informed, environmentally sound decisions;
• Foster resilient actions and sustainable communities - particularly along the Connecticut coastline and inland waterways - that can adapt to the impacts and hazards of climate change; and
• Reduce the loss of life and property, natural system and ecological damage, and social disruption from high-impact events.
Those requesting Matching Funds should consult the CIRCA office via email at CIRCA_matchingfunds@uconn.edu with any questions. Matching Fund request forms can be found at http://circa.uconn.edu/funds.htm. All requesting funds must complete the form in its entirety on or before September 15, 2015. Matching Funds requests will be accepted on a rolling basis.
Notification of award: Requests will be acted upon every two months. The review will be held on September 15, 2015 and every two months thereafter.
August Greetings!!!
There has been some exciting news - Friends of Grove Street Cemetery now has a Facebook page.
So we invite everyone to take a peek and maybe you would like to follow us on Facebook. It has just been about 7 weeks since it has been in place for us.
Come one - Come all!!!
All the best to everyone,
Patricia Illingworth
Chief Docent