All Posts (4)

Sort by

31205112867?profile=RESIZE_584x

Self-trust isn’t built by always making the right decision. It’s built by staying on your own side after you make one.

When people talk about self-sabotage, they often describe it as though some inexplicable part of them is determined to ruin their lives.

Why did I ignore what I knew about that person?

Why did I agree to something I didn’t want to do?

Why did I talk myself out of an opportunity I wanted?

Why do I keep making choices that hurt me?

I used to think about self-sabotage this way too. But through my recovery, my reparenting journey, and years of helping people learn to create boundaries, I’ve come to understand it differently.

What we call self-sabotage is often self-abandonment.

That distinction matters because sabotage sounds like something is wrong with you. Self-abandonment tells you what is actually happening: at the moment when you most need your own care, protection, honesty, or support, you leave yourself.

You override what you know. You dismiss what you feel. You ignore what your body is telling you. You make someone else’s comfort more important than your internal reality. You organize your decisions to avoid guilt, disapproval, conflict, or rejection instead of around what is true for you.

You may believe the problem is that you don’t know how to make good decisions. But often, the deeper problem is that you haven’t yet learned how to remain connected to yourself while you make them.

Self-abandonment was once an intelligent strategy

Many of us learned to abandon ourselves long before we had language for what we were doing. No one sat us down and said, “If you want to belong here, you’ll need to stop listening to yourself.” We learned it through experience.

It didn’t feel safe to have needs, feelings, preferences, or limits. Staying in relationship and connection with others, especially the adults caring for us, depended on being agreeable, useful, undemanding, successful, quiet, or easy to manage. You likely learned that other people’s emotions mattered more than yours, or that telling the truth about your experience created conflict that you weren’t equipped to handle.

Self-abandonment helped you preserve whatever connection, predictability, or safety was available to you. It was an intelligent adaptation to circumstances you couldn’t control. Until it wasn’t.

Your nervous system and thinking patterns that developed back has not have been updated yet if that’s still happening. If you still react as though someone’s disappointment could threaten your belonging, or as though making a mistake could leave you completely unprotected, it’s still happening. A present-day decision touches an old “fault line,” your survival response activates, and suddenly you become disconnected from what you know as an adult. You revert to childhood reactions and behavior patterns.

This is why you can understand boundaries intellectually and still override yourself in the moment. It’s also why another boundary script isn’t always the answer. The problem may not be that you don’t know what to say. The problem may be that your system still believes it’s dangerous to remain on your own side while someone else is upset.

The fear beneath so many decisions

Many decisions that appear to be about work, relationships, family, money or time are quietly organized around one question:

What do I need to do so I won’t be abandoned?
 

We say yes because we’re afraid someone will withdraw, reject or abandon us. We stay in situations that aren’t good for us because leaving feels more frightening than staying. We trust people who have repeatedly shown themselves to be untrustworthy because believing what we see might require us to act. We overexplain our decisions because we hope that, if the other person understands us, they won’t disapprove of us – which feels intolerable.

Sometimes we don’t go after what we want because failing would confirm our greatest fears about ourselves. Sometimes we don’t take care of basic needs because urgency feels more legitimate than rest, food, pleasure, or attention to the body. We keep organizing our lives around a future version of ourselves while abandoning the person who is living our life today.

These choices can look very different from the outside, but the internal pattern is the same. We leave ourselves in an attempt to prevent someone or something else from leaving us.

The painful irony is that self-abandonment doesn’t protect us from abandonment. It ensures that we are already abandoned, because the real version of us isn’t fully present in our own life or relationships.

You can’t create internal safety by focusing externally

For most of my life, my “center of gravity” was outside me. I paid close attention to what other people felt, wanted, thought, and needed. I tried to create a sense of safety by managing what was happening around me with other people, places and things.

Over time, I began repeatedly asking myself, “What’s going on for me?” I learned to notice my internal signals before immediately turning my attention outward. Slowly, my center of gravity moved inside me.

That is what internal safety means to me now. It doesn’t mean I always feel calm, certain, or fearless. It means I can experience discomfort without automatically abandoning myself to make it stop.

I can feel guilt without treating guilt as proof that I’ve done something wrong. I can let someone be disappointed without reversing a decision that is right for me. I can discover that I trusted the wrong person without attacking myself for failing to know sooner. I can make an imperfect choice and remain kind to myself.

Internal safety cannot be created through enough approval, reassurance, control, or certainty. It is built from the inside out, each time you stay with yourself in the presence of emotion. Each time you don’t abandon yourself to your old patterns.

Self-trust is NOT trusting yourself to get everything “right”

When people say they don’t trust themselves, they often mean they’re afraid of making the wrong decision. They want a guarantee that they won’t regret their choice, hurt someone, miss an opportunity, or discover later that they misunderstood the situation.

But self-trust isn’t certainty about the future. It’s believing that you will remain with yourself regardless of what the future brings. You’ll stay connected to what’s true for you and not abandon your truths in preference of others.

You can trust yourself to notice when new information changes what you know. You can trust yourself to change your mind when changing your mind is appropriate. You can trust yourself to repair what you can, learn from what happened, and make a different choice next time. Most importantly, you can trust yourself not to turn against yourself simply because a decision didn’t produce the outcome you hoped for.

The goal is not to become someone who never makes an imperfect decision. The goal is to become someone who doesn’t disappear when life becomes difficult.
That is a very different kind of self-trust.

Becoming your own loving parent

One of the deepest parts of my recovery has been learning to become my own loving parent. At its most basic, reparenting means learning to treat yourself with the care, protection, patience, and guidance you may not have consistently received when you were young.

A loving parent doesn’t demand that a child predict the future perfectly before making a decision. They help the child consider what they know, make the best choice available, and respond to whatever happens next.

They don’t say, “I can’t believe you didn’t know better.” They say, “Now we know more. What do you need?”

They don’t withdraw love when the child disappoints someone. They say, “You’re allowed to make a choice that another person doesn’t like.”

They don’t shame fear or insist that it disappear before the child acts. They say, “I know this is scary. I’m here, and we’ll do it together.”

This is how you begin building a secure attachment to yourself. You stop requiring yourself to be certain, fearless, or perfect before you offer yourself support. You become the person who stays.

And when you stop abandoning yourself, the fear of other people abandoning you begins to lose its power. You may still feel grief, rejection, or disappointment when a relationship changes. But you’re no longer depending on that relationship to keep you from being completely alone, because you haven’t left yourself.

Boundaries are one way we practice staying

This is where boundaries remain central to my work, even as my work has expanded into internal safety, self-trust, attachment, emotional regulation, and reparenting.

A boundary is not only something you communicate to another person. It’s a decision (yes, a decision) not to abandon yourself in the presence of emotion.

You stay connected to what you know while someone disagrees with you. You remember your values while guilt tells you to change course. You allow another person to have their experience without making their feelings the deciding factor in your decision-making. You listen when your body, resentment, exhaustion, or anxiety tells you that something isn’t working.

Sometimes the boundary is spoken aloud. Sometimes it is entirely internal. It might sound like, “This feeling is not a command,” “I don’t have to decide this right now,” or “I’m not going to attack myself for being afraid.”

Boundaries create healthy separation with connection. They allow you to remain connected to other people without disconnecting from yourself. In that sense, every boundary that holds is an act of attachment repair in real time.

The decision beneath all the other decisions

Throughout this month, we’ve explored what happens when you don’t recognize that you have choices, how control can masquerade as self-trust, and why believing what you’re already seeing matters more than finding someone who can guarantee you’ll never be hurt.

Underneath all of those ideas is one foundational decision:

Will I stay with myself?

Will I stay when I don’t know what will happen? …when someone doesn’t like my choice? … when I discover I was wrong? ...when guilt, fear, shame, or uncertainty arrives?

You won’t do this perfectly. No one does (including me, though I’ve gotten much, much better). Sometimes you’ll realize after the fact that you overrode yourself, dismissed what you knew, or made fear the deciding factor. That realization doesn’t mean you’ve failed. It is an opportunity to return to yourself

You can pause and ask, “Where did I leave myself, and what would it look like to come back?” or “What kind of support do I need from myself to handle this differently next time?”

Every time you return instead of attacking yourself, you become a little more trustworthy to yourself. Every time you honor an internal signal, tell yourself the truth, or allow another person to be disappointed, your system gathers evidence that staying connected to yourself is survivable.

Eventually, self-trust becomes less about knowing which decision is right and more about knowing who will be there afterward.

You will.

If you want to go deeper, download my free Internal Safety Resource Pack if you want practical support for staying connected to yourself when guilt, fear, or someone else’s reaction makes a boundary difficult to hold.

Read more…

City Gallery Exhibit E PLURIBUS Celebrates the Many Colors of Patriotism

Featuring Art Flags that Celebrate Diversity by Fiber Artist Muriel Stockdale

Muriel Stockdale’s renowned United States flag series, E PLURIBUS, celebrates the many colors of patriotism found every day in the United States. A special showing of her work, including a new flag to honor our 250-year anniversary, will be on view at City Gallery, August 7 - August 23. The Opening Reception will be held on Friday, August 7, from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m., with an Artist Talk starting at 4 p.m.

The E PLURIBUS flags are exquisitely hand crafted in the U.S.A. from typical fabrics representing diverse cultures that make up this American mosaic. As an immigrant, Muriel is awed by the harmonious co-existence of Americans who celebrate their freedom in all possible ways. “This country was created by dissension and protest against oppression, and out of that the people forged superb documents and mandates that guarantee freedom and hope for all people,” she says. “In the United States, patriotism is multifaceted, multicolored, and multidimensional.” Her series of surprising U.S. Flags invites a broader look at what patriotism is and can still be in the future.

Since 2003, Muriel has continually created additions to her culturally celebrative art series of USA flags. Currently, 16 E Pluribus flags are installed permanently in the lobby of 315 Hudson Street, New York City. Installations of her flag series have been presented at BRIC Media Arts (Brooklyn, NY), the Cultural Alliance of Western Connecticut (Danbury), the Monroe C. Gutman Library Gallery of the Harvard Graduate School of Education (Boston, MA), ARC Fine Art (Fairfield), Martha Stewart’s American Made Summit, and at Charlotte’s Place, a Trinity Church Community Center where she was commissioned to oversee construction of a community art flag to honor the tenth anniversary of 9/11. The flags have been seen in over 30 venues and galleries in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut, and the New Britain Museum of American Art now owns the original E Pluribus African flag as part of its permanent collection. 

Originally from the United Kingdom, Muriel Stockdale earned her BS from the University of Vermont with a BS in Nutrition, and her MFA New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts Graduate Design Department. Over the last 40 years, while maintaining a successful career in costume design, she has directed shows in NYC and in New England, performed onstage, crewed backstage, managed costume shops, designed and painted scenery, and taught aspiring designers. She is a Reiki healer, a writer, teacher, media consultant, and artist.

Muriel has enjoyed an extensive and varied career in the entertainment industry, creating scenery and outstanding costumes for film, TV, and live entertainment including Disney, Children’s Television Workshop, NBC, CBS, PBS, ABC, Universal Television, and dozens of US and European regional theaters. Muriel has worked with world-renowned, award-winning performers, directors, writers, and composers such as Richard Adler, Colleen Dewhurst, Adriana Trigiani, Kermit the Frog, Tony Roberts, S. Epatha Merkeson, Lynn Redgrave, and Edward Albee. She has spent over 20 years working with Jim Henson Productions, building and designing costumes for puppets and people.

The exhibit E PLURIBUS and the Opening Reception and Artist Talk are free and open to the public. City Gallery is located at 994 State Street, New Haven, CT 06511. Gallery hours are Friday - Sunday, 12 p.m. - 4 p.m., or by appointment. For further information please contact City Gallery, info@city-gallery.org, www.city-gallery.org.

 

Read more…

Linked below you will find clear information about the recent Supreme Court decision on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and what it means. You will also find what your rights are under the Constitution, resources to help you and your family prepare, and organizations working closely with the Haitian community in Connecticut that can offer support. We will keep this page updated with the latest news.

https://ctimmigrants.base44.app/ResourceList?language=ht

_________________________

Pastor Martin Niemöller

Download a copy of First They Came by Pastor Martin Niemöller

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Read more…

See the data.

Public opinion data come from the Yale Climate Opinion Maps (YCOM), which are based on a statistical model that employs nationally representative Climate Change in the American Mind (CCAM) surveys conducted between 2008 and 2024. The model combines geographic, census, socioeconomic, and political data with CCAM survey data collected by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication (combined n > 35,000). For more information about the survey question wording and methodology, please visit YCOM: climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us

 

Read more…

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives